Category Archives: Commemorations

Always Remember: Amsterdam’s February Strike 1941-2021

On this date every year, I tell two stories: the February Strike in Amsterdam which is still little known outside the Netherlands, and how my life changed when I attended the 60th commemoration of that Strike in 2001.  As with Passover and Christmas, the stories don’t change much, but every year they have different insights to offer.  New facts and memories always appear if I pause and look for them.  This year is the eightieth anniversary, and given the pandemic it will have only a virtual celebration and broadcast, so it’s even more important to write and remember.

Big crowd of people

The February 25 Strike in Amsterdam, 1941

On the historical side, I try to learn something unfamiliar about the Strike every year, as well as reminding myself and everybody else of why and how it happened.  When the word spread that 425 Jewish men had been rounded up in the Jonas Daniel Meijerplein, the communists and trade unions reacted first.  Without the internet to help them, they immediately organized a meeting at the Noorderkerk in the Jordaan, the workers’ quarter.

Overnight, they produced a mimeographed sheet:  “Strike! Strike! Strike!” to protest the roundup.  Was it the dockworkers who struck first on February 25, or the tram workers?  It doesn’t really matter.  My new fact for this year is that workers on bicycles pedaled through the city went and knocked on doors to bring people into the streets.  They were wildly successful, with 300,000 people participating.  Those who have read An Address in Amsterdam may recall that my heroine Rachel attends the Strike, and it’s her first link to the resistance.  That scene was re-created from historical accounts and photos, so I feel as if I was there myself.

The Noorderkerk, where the Strike was organized

People decided to strike in a context that would dishearten almost anyone.  The Nazis had been in power since the prior May 1940.  The Aryan attestation had been inflicted on all government employees, which meant many had been fired for being considered Jewish – people like the musicians in the Concertgebouw orchestra, professors at the universities, civil servants at all levels.  The press was under the German thumb, so people were already depending on underground papers which would multiply later.  The economic hardship of war had begun, and people needed their jobs more than ever.  They lived in a society where being law-abiding was a cardinal virtue.  And yet they decided to strike.  Not because their uncles and brothers had been rounded up, but because their Jewish fellow citizens and comrades were under attack.

Many Jewish people were largely assimilated into the middle class, and somewhat in the working class.  One theory about why the Dutch protested the first roundup when others did not is the personal connections among workers, since in many industries Jews and Gentiles worked side by side.  Another factor is that the Netherlands was a far more open and tolerant society than many around it – a secular, commercially based country with a high regard for human rights.  And yet another is that many Dutch hated the Germans and the Occupation, and the Strike expressed that.

Crowd during February Strike

Source: Dutch National Archive

The measure of their actions is not effectiveness in a practical sense.  They didn’t stop the Germans; in fact, the reprisals were severe, beginning with bloodshed on the streets and ending with executions of 18 of the organizers.  What they created, however, is this:  a beacon that is still shining on us, enjoining us to speak up for what we know is right.  That moment of solidarity still illumines our lives and changes our reality.  What is the challenge to us, when we read about the example of people who saw a moral outrage committed, and immediately organized to make a widespread and public protest?  Today, when we see a great wrong being committed, we know it is our duty to act.

My first moment of understanding all that was exactly twenty years ago.  Come back with me.  It is a frigid day, grey like many Amsterdam winter days, with a pervasive chill.  My partner Joanna and I stand as close together as we can, held back by a fence.  We are in the Jonas Daniel Meijerplein, named for the Netherlands’ first Jewish lawyer.  The immense 17th century Portuguese Synagogue looms over us, its windows providing the only illumination within.  Behind us are the four small Ashkenazi Synagogues, skillfully merged into today’s Jewish Historical Museum.  I’d never heard of the February Strike until I visited there the week before.  “Does anything special happen on the 25th?” I’d asked.

The guard pointed out the glass doors.  “Yes, right by the statue of The Dockworker over there. He’s the symbolic figure of the Strike.  Come at 5:00.”

The Dockworker, by resister Mari Andriessen

Joanna and I did, as a gesture of respect for the strikers who made a futile but courageous and beautiful effort.  We arrived at 5:02, but the event was already in process.  We’d expected hours of speeches and a modest crowd, but instead the square is absolutely crammed.  Within ten minutes silence falls, and here we are.  A few people at a time are allowed to step forward (from an orderly line, of course) and lay flowers at the feet of the beefy Dockworker.  Although the crowd is mixed in age and otherwise, the first people permitted to approach are the oldest, their white hair shining against their dark coats, some utterly upright and others bent or needing a wheelchair.

A man in a wheelchair preparing to lay flowers

Someone who remembers

The woman behind us whispers that these are the living strikers, and their families and friends.  Their faces are somber.  No one looks proud or pleased with themselves; the ghosts of the Jewish people who were rounded up are too close for that.  The Strike isn’t mere history that happened before I was born in 1948.  These people, their very bodies, had been there, and now we are in the same place and time, connected.  They had been there.  And “there” is here, where the roundup had actually happened, where the strikers had surged past, hundreds of thousands of them.  The story knocks me on the head like a bat.  These people are all here to remember, and their story has become mine.  Mine to reckon with, be tormented by, and find some way to tell.  It isn’t just something in a book; the people who had been rounded up in this square had almost all been murdered, and so had the strike organizers.

Only the flowers make it bearable at all.

Almost everyone except us has brought them:  everything from small batches of forced forsythia cut at home to immense formal displays.  The procession to the Dockworker moves very slowly:  first the strikers, then synagogues, Jewish organizations, labor unions and churches, then countries, and finally individuals.  Each one bends over to lay their flowers among the others, choosing their spot, then straightening up and pausing to remember, perhaps to pray.  They move along, and the handful of people follows.  The whole event takes on a meditative pace.  If we weren’t shivering, time would hardly seem to pass at all.

Grandmothers hold hands with little ones and probably tell the story that must never be forgotten, a few people of color watch quietly until it’s their turn, and oblivious toddlers ride on their father’s tall shoulders.  The sun is going down somewhere behind the clouds, and the darkness thickens.  Still the people keep coming to the feet of the Dockworker, still pile flowers by the flowers that were already heaped, arranging them so nothing is hidden.
At last, at 6:30, it is our turn.  We waited until the very end, as outsiders with nothing to offer but ourselves.

We kneel.  We are close enough to see the flowers now.  A note in spidery handwriting is attached to a bunch of white snowdrops, held together with aluminum foil.  Hebrew letters embossed in gold on broad ribbons flow around an arrangement of cascading scarlet tulips.  The printed words from the “people and government of Sweden” bedeck a sumptuous wreath of red roses and white lilies.  The fragrance is euphoric, mingling spring and summer on that dark, cold day.  It gives the dead back to us, makes us feel their courage and the terrible loss.  It gives us the stories to tell as long as we live.

 

A Different Remembrance Day 2020

This time, I’d like to send a more personal letter than usual, in keeping with the contemplative nature of “sheltering in place.”  As one of my friends wrote me, “We are all given this once in a lifetime opportunity to reassess how we use our time on earth.”  I miss meeting people in person to reflect on the complexities of Amsterdam in 1940-45, and what we can learn from those times, especially the resistance.  Thank you for being one of the people who has shared that experience with me and made it possible.

May 4 is particularly a time of reflection, because it is the Day of Remembrance in the Netherlands.  It is meant to honor everyone who died in World War II, including particularly the 104,000 Jewish people and others who were murdered in the Holocaust.  I’ve been to many deeply moving commemorations over the years:  an art ritual in a park surrounded by streets once full of Jewish people (http://maryfillmore.com/tag/art-ritual/), a neighborhood event beside a small memorial to local citizens who were randomly executed, even the huge crowd with the Queen (at that time, now the King) at Dam Square.  Here is the scene as it was this year:

 

What has always affected me most is the two minutes of silence at eight o’clock in the evening, still broad daylight in Amsterdam with its gardens burgeoning with late tulips, the canals lined with elms in their new-leafed finery.  The trams, the bicycles, the cars, even the people come to a halt.  Even the legendarily prompt Dutch trains stop running.  My dearest friend Eliane Vogel Polsky, herself hidden in plain sight as a Jewish teenager, was once traveling from Brussels to Amsterdam to visit us on May 4.  The conductor announced the two minutes of silence and asked people’s cooperation.  To Eliane’s astonishment, even the teenagers playing cards at a nearby table stopped and sat quietly.  She was in tears when she told us about it.  To her, it was an affirmation that the great suffering of that time had not been forgotten.

“These are little people. They can only kill us.” Rabbi Frank


Now that she, my best friend, is gone, I feel that I must use those two minutes of silence well.  My years of study of the Holocaust and resistance gave me both a darker view of what people are capable of, and a vision of how, even in the most terrible times and under extreme pressures, human generosity and even valor break through.  Think of Rabbi Frank who told his imprisoned and terrified congregants, “These are little people.  They can only kill us.”  Or of the ten Boom family and so many others like them, hiding their neighbors in peril of their own lives.  When the Nazis threatened Corrie’s father with execution, he replied “It would be an honor to give my life for God’s ancient people.”

Reorienting Ourselves
What can we do to be worthy inheritors of those we remember on May 4?  We are living in a moment when the noble thing to do is stay home, wash our hands, wear a mask when we go out, and support others at a distance.  It doesn’t sound like much beside the Dutch Resistance, does it?  And yet it is what our times call for – that, and reorientation from our busy-busy, overconsuming lives that are literally costing us the earth.  That difficult task, and resisting the political insanity of our times, is worthy of our gifts.  At the most intimate level, I am acutely aware that these days may give me my last chance to be kind to a neighbor I don’t especially enjoy, to tell and show the people I love how important they are to me, and particularly to leave an impression in the hearts of the children who might not know me when they are older.  But I also must be thinking in the most long term sense, how to extend the reprieve we have given the earth by not driving and extracting and smashing, so that both humans and all the other creatures can flourish differently.  What would that reprieve mean for me, as an individual, for my country and the world?  That’s where I need the courage the Dutch resisters had. 

This year, a double hush falls at this moment: the calm the pandemic has demanded of us, and the remembrance the dead deserve from us.  Each of us can find the way toward right action at this time.  Will we have shone light for others?  Can we find ways, as so many people in hiding (Jewish and Gentile) did, to make a life of purpose and dignity in confinement?  Can we address the desperation of those who need food and rent and succor?  So much is at stake.  We are in the kind of predicament that can topple even strong democracies. 

Let’s find strength in ourselves, in the dead, and in each other.  Somehow, as they did, we will find a path.  Thanks for staying in touch with me and be well,

Mary

P.S.  The New York Times had a wonderful article recently about bringing Dutch wartime diaries out of the archives where they were buried thanks to volunteers:  https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/15/arts/dutch-war-diaries.html

I reacted to it by writing about “Listening to Dutch Ghosts as We Shelter in Place” below, at http://maryfillmore.com/listening-to-dutch-ghosts-as-we-shelter-in-place/.

It couldn’t happen there, either

The February 1941 Strike brought 300,000 Amsterdammers into the street to protest the first roundup of Jewish people, the only such strike in Western Europe. Every February 25, thousands still gather and lay flowers at the foot of the Dockworker, the statue who symbolizes this mass action. The strikers participated despite the presence of German soldiers and police throughout the city. For the Jewish people, it was a significant moment of affirmation by their fellow citizens.


  
Statue of symbolic figure of the February strike with flowers at his feet
The Dockworker Statue in Amsterdam on February 25

 

The Strike challenges progressive Americans. When the word spread that 425 Jewish men had been rounded up and shipped off, the Strike was organized almost overnight. What would it take to bring us into the streets in comparable numbers (almost 40% of the city in that case)? Children in cages? Turning away prospective refugees as the U.S. did in the 1930s when Jews were fleeing Hitler? Slashing food stamps to the bone? The slaughter of school children with assault weapons?

And yet, how much would a strike like Amsterdam’s really accomplish? Although it was a courageous gesture and lifted spirits for a few days, the February Strike sputtered out. The Germans were astonished that the other Dutch would stand up for their Jewish neighbors, so the ensuing crackdown was delayed – but vicious. Only a tiny sliver of people actually resisted from that time forward. Most hunkered down, shook their heads, complied, and tried to survive.

In reflecting on what such people “should” have done, it’s all too easy to make snap judgements and condemn those who were barely surviving on many levels. When the Nazi Occupation began, the Germans carefully started small in attacking the Jewish people and others whom they hated. Initially, the invaders simply turned the other way when local anti-Semites started beating Jewish people up and breaking windows. That set the tone for what was to follow, an air of permissiveness. Slowly but surely, the Nazi propaganda worked. Attacks intensified, depicting Jewish people as barely human, with ugly language to match.

Poster of Nazi propaganda against Jewish people
Poster for the Dutch version of “The Eternal Jew,” a Nazi propaganda film

Following the Strike, the other Dutch people were being conditioned not to look, not to notice, much as we are today. The reporting on family separation of refugee families, for example, is a rarity, so that the anguish of children placed with unknown foster families or in institutions is erased. The threats to Vermont’s migrant dairy workers are escalating, but only the workers themselves and close allies hear about it regularly. New prisons are called “detention centers” and are buried in rural areas where legal help is almost non-existent. Our country, 97% immigrants and refugees, is closing the door to asylum seekers. How quickly what is patently wrong becomes normalized.

The miracle in the 1940s is that a few Dutch people didn’t buy the Nazi propaganda. Their minds kept working after the Strike, and they resisted wherever they were, however they could. They transcribed illegal BBC broadcasts, they produced and distributed underground newspapers, they hid their Jewish neighbors or strangers, they forged identity cards and more, they cleaned hideaways for airmen, they smuggled Jewish children to the countryside and much more. They risked their lives and their peace of mind, and that of their families. Historians say about 25,000 people resisted, and it could be many more, but it still is far less than 1% of the population.

 

Woman with a group of children she tried to save from the Nazis
Miss Henriette Pimental in her child care center, which smuggled Jewish children to safety

Most Dutch people believed “It can’t happen here,” and tried to get on with normal life as much as possible. They believed the Germans wouldn’t dare go too far in their anti-Jewish program. The Netherlands had been the safest place in Europe for religious minorities since the Inquisition. Both Dutch Jews and Gentiles believed Hitler wouldn’t dare do in Amsterdam what he did in Berlin. Tragically, 75% of the Jewish people in the Netherlands were rounded up and murdered, 80% in Amsterdam. The Germans made rules about keeping the blinds closed during roundups. Toward the end, they came to the neighborhood of a resister and shot people at random, whether or not they were involved in any way. The poisonous atmosphere daunted people and twisted their thinking. Even when their neighbors were taken away under their noses, they did nothing. Some were the same people who roared into action for the February Strike.

What is happening to us, and what are we going to do about it?

 

The Echoes of Kristallnacht

Synagogue in flames

Kristallnacht is significant because it was a moment of warning about what was to come. What appeared to be individual violence carried out by thugs was specifically sanctioned and incited by the state.  What happened that night of November 9-10, 1938?  As always, there was an excuse.

Thousands of Polish Jews had been expelled from Germany, and an enraged Jewish teenager shot a German diplomat as a result.   The diplomat died about the same time as a big Nazi celebration, and Goebbels used the occasion to call for a rampage – but not officially.  “The Führer has decided that … demonstrations should not be prepared or organized by the Party, but insofar as they erupt spontaneously, they are not to be hampered.”  This was both a call and a license to vandalize Jewish homes, businesses, and synagogues.  The word was passed down from party officials and the Security Police to their local outlets.  Although the Nazis later tried to maintain the fiction that these events happened locally, it’s clear that they were orchestrated from Berlin.

The numbers tell one part of the story of the night of November 9-10:  91 people dead, 267 synagogues desecrated or destroyed, some of them burning through the night in full view of fire departments which were ordered to watch unless nearby buildings were threatened.  More than 7500 Jewish businesses were destroyed and looted.  But that’s only part of the story.

Kristallnacht was the moment when the German state first arrested people only because they were Jewish.  They took 30,000 Jewish men, mostly young and vigorous per the orders from above, shipped them off to work and concentration camps.  (The men below were marched through the streets and forced to watch as a synagogue burned.)  Some died of the camp conditions, but many were released when they agreed to immigrate.

Men arrested during Kristallnacht

That’s where Kristallnacht and my own life’s work intersect. Kristallnacht sounded a warning that German Jews could not ignore.  The Netherlands had been neutral in World War I, and there was a longstanding, well integrated Jewish community there.  After Kristallnacht, it’s not surprising that more than 40,000 German Jews applied for a visa to enter the Netherlands, but only 7,000 got one, and even they were put in camps. In desperation, 2,000 more refugees snuck in, and at least the Dutch didn’t send them back, although they did incarcerate them.  Is this an echo of the situation of refugees who try to enter the U.S. today?  We’ll come back to that point.

Unfortunately, most of the German Jews who made it into the Netherlands were rounded up and murdered.  Volumes have been written about how and why the Holocaust could have happened in as open and tolerant a society as the Netherlands.  One factor was surely the superior systems the Dutch developed to identify who lived where, in an orderly population register which made it easy to check whether an identity card was genuine or not.  It also greatly facilitated roundups by showing where the Jewish people were living.  The Holocaust was also facilitated by the fact that the Dutch were and are traditionally a law-abiding people who basically trusted their government.  There was no tradition of resistance there, as there was in countries like Belgium, France and Italy.  Many other factors have been explored in response to the question, “How could the Holocaust happen in the Netherlands – and to such a devastating degree?”

Whatever scholars may differ about, the collusion of ordinary people was an absolutely key factor.  Many minded their own business and tried to keep life going on as normally as they could, activities which would have been benign in a different time, but in this time made them colluders with the Nazis.

women in front of store with smashed windows Kristallnacht

Looking at the situation instead from the Dutch Jewish point of view, it seems strange that most of them simply did not believe that they would lose their homes, their businesses and professions, their freedom of movement and ultimately their lives.  We cannot underestimate how safe they felt.  Let’s hear from Dr. Jacob Presser on this point.  Dr. Presser was a Jewish historian who himself survived the war by hiding, and he spent 12 years researching and writing the classic volume Ashes in the Wind:  The Destruction of Dutch Jewry.  Here’s how he depicts the mood of his Jewish countrymen at the beginning of 1942:

“Many pinned their hopes on the likelihood of Germany eventually losing the war, and consoled themselves with the knowledge that, however bad their position, it could have been much worse.  Moreover, few Jews believed that the Germans would carry their policy to the limit.  True, there had been raids and hundreds had died, but, thank God, most Dutch Jews had been allowed to remain in their old homes.  True also, the Germans had sounded the ugly word of ’emigration,’ but had they not prefixed the comforting adjective ‘voluntary’ – and was the measure not directed at foreign rather than Dutch Jews?”  That gives us a sense of why only about one Jewish person in seven hid.

woman emerging from underground hiding place

We’ve all heard of the Dutch resistance and revered it.  Having studied it for 13 years as I researched and wrote An Address in Amsterdam, I honor what those people did, in fear of their lives – especially those who had the double jeopardy of being Jewish.  That’s why I chose to write about a young Jewish woman who joins the resistance.  But as much as we honor those resisters, we can never forget how few they were.  Yes, historians say 24-25,000, and I think we can double that safely if we include people who only helped occasionally.  But even so, we aren’t up to ONE PERCENT in a country of 8.7 million.

No one can review this history without a sense of apprehension. Yet there are so many differences between our situation now, and that in Germany or the Netherlands under the Nazis.

  • We live in a constitutional democracy
  • Our press is still speaking up to some extent
  • Violence against persecuted groups is still sporadic and occasional, and
  • We do have elections so we can correct the course.

And yet – who among us has not wondered

  • Are we sliding down the slope from civilization to barbarism?  Because it is a slope, not a single moment of choice.
  • Is the American Jewish community not, like those in Germany and the Netherlands, deeply integrated into society at large?  Yet the fact of assimilation did not protect them.

Kristallnacht broken windows

If we look back to the times that began with Kristallnacht for inspiration as well as horror, what can we find to guide us now?  Kristallnacht was a time when many people woke up and realized that the Nazis were in earnest, that their hatred had turned to broken bones and windows, desecrated synagogues and 30,000 Jewish prisoners.  Some of those people who woke up resisted, by fleeing or becoming active against the Nazis or both.

Can we make this anniversary of Kristallnacht our own moment of awakening?

When we hear code words for white nationalism and supremacy become acceptable in public discourse, can we speak up against them?

When we hear of hate crimes – whether they are in Charlottesville or Sacramento or Omaha – whether they are against peaceful protestors or African American men or someone who looked Muslim — can we respond with empathy and unity, as we did for Pittsburgh.

low candles lit

Can we say that whatever acts of hatred the U.S. government itself is committing must be stopped – and by us?  To take a single example, think of children who are refugees and immigrants like my impoverished ancestors and perhaps yours.  They are being stolen from their parents, just as they were at the gates of other camps.  Can we claim those children, imprisoned in “tent cities,” that barbarous euphemism?  Can we fight for them as strenuously as we would for our own children?  Are they ours? If our tax dollars are paying for them to be kidnapped and imprisoned, are they not ours?

Let’s change gears and focus for a moment on the people who stayed home for Kristallnacht.  They may have been quieter anti-Semites, or they may have been friendly to the Jewish people and disgusted by the violence in the streets.  But they didn’t stop it.  This is the story in the Netherlands, as well.

I wish I could offer you more words of comfort today.  But all I can bring you is what your people have always done – to continue your hard work in the service of other persecuted people and yourselves.  Work that everyone is morally and ethically required to do, whether or not we ever see the results.  We are in a time when that spirit is more needed than ever.

Let’s not allow the 80th anniversary of Kristallnacht and the murders in Pittsburgh to terrify and dishearten us.  May they instead awaken us to be even more active on behalf of justice, and what used to be called “the human family.” As I need not remind you, “You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to desist from it.”

Barbara Chen Untitled Sculpture

Untitled, by Barbara Chen

This talk was part of the Shabbat service at the  Israel Congregation of Manchester, Vermont, on Friday, November 9, 2018.  Many thanks to them for inviting me.

Anne Frank’s Birthday: Fact and Fiction

 

Anne Frank 1940 school photo

No one knows exactly when Anne Frank died in 1945, but we do know she was born on June 12, 1929. Every year, I remember how close I felt to her as an eleven-year-old reading The Diary of a Young Girl in a small closet in North Carolina. Anne was an intimate friend at a time when I had very few. Like so many girls, I completely identified with her nascent romantic and sexual longings, her hatred of her mother, her deep humanitarian, and her aspirations as a writer.

Four decades later, I had the joy of living in Amsterdam for six months, and discovered a distressing truth about that tolerant city: 80% of its Jewish people were rounded up and murdered. My child’s view that no one on earth could have suffered more than Anne was so wrong. She was much luckier than most. The Franks’ hiding place was ready in advance, they were all hidden together for 25 months, they had more room and comfort than most people (small as it was), and the quality of support from Miep Gies and others was extraordinary.

In 2002, while staying a few blocks from Anne Frank’s hiding place, I discovered that Jewish people had also been hidden in the attic above our apartment. When I learned that they were last seen fleeing over the rooftops as the Nazis shot at them, I had to learn more about the larger story of which Anne’s was only a part. I began imagining who those people were, and an historical novel began to take shape. For thirteen years, I read histories and memoirs; visited museums, archives, and libraries; listened to people who would talk with me; and wandered the canals looking for unmarked addresses where important events took place. That’s one of many reasons my book is called An Address in Amsterdam.

Resistance Courier at Amsterdam Verzetsmuseum

Resistance Courier at Verzetsmuseum, Amsterdam

As much as I regarded Anne with a child’s adoring eyes, and admired her with an adult’s greater discernment, I also realized that she was confined by her parents’ choices as well as the Nazi Occupation. She was not quite 11 when the Germans invaded the neutral Netherlands. If Anne Frank had been a few years older, it’s hard to imagine that she wouldn’t have found a way to help the resistance.

While I knew that my book would have a young Jewish woman as a heroine, I wanted to write about someone who was old enough to make her own decisions, but young enough that she would have to grow up fast in order to do so. How did an ordinary young woman decide to risk her life as a resister? What would she actually do, and how? As Rachel Klein, my heroine, formed in my imagination, I didn’t see her as an older Anne Frank, but as her own person, with different needs and ambitions than Anne. However, to be sure that I wasn’t unduly influenced, I avoided reading the Diary again until An Address in Amsterdam was done and in press.

As I re-read the Revised Critical Edition which compares all the versions of the Diary, I found my old friend Anne Frank still there – vulnerable, smart, fearful. Perhaps because the times had changed so much, I also heard more clearly than ever the warnings in her work, and her injunction to us now. Today, I’m not so much moved by the girl who wrote “I still believe that people are good at heart,” as the one who speaks to us now: “How wonderful it is that no one need wait a single moment before trying to improve the world.”